|
Restructured Model
Regional International Semester
STRENGTHS
- Continuity of experience and learning
- Integration of learning between theory and practice (foreign language; environmental studies; political
science)
-
More cost effective than a full semester travel component
- Shorter abroad experience is less disruptive to student
lives
- Financial aid availability
- Longer than spring-break model
- Availability of modular courses already established
- Academic solidity – antidote to ‘Cancun’ syndrome
- Frees up stay- at-home faculty to do research, etc.
- Collaboration with other faculty
- Potential for visibility to other students
- Potential for team teaching
- Intensive orientation
- Home institution tuition, etc.
- Focused, intensive study
|
WEAKNESSES
- Modular nature of model; does not fit well into traditional
semester
- Students must complete entire program; not as flexible
- Institutions must make modules interchangeable
- Faculty course load and coverage
- Accountability; faculty who do prep work and don’t travel miss opportunity to learn from experience and follow-through with academic
goals
- Motivation to teach is diminished if faculty does not travel with
group
- Additional costs of 4-week abroad component vs. 2-week
- Faculty availability
- Model only works with full-time students
- Employment schedules of students
- Recruitment issues
- Coping
|
OPPORTUNITIES
- Four week model provides enhanced professional development more so than two
week
- Establishing linkages abroad (sister cities, other cities)
- Opportunity to further strengthen international programs at each
institution
- Lead to more developed consortial infrastructure
- Recruitment of potential students
- Faculty availability is greater in summer; opportunities for faculty participation are greater in summer (student
availability?)
- Opportunities to develop scholarships/funding specifically to support consortial efforts
|
THREATS
- Administratively labor intensive; high cost
- Under enrollment
- Lack of model for VTRIP consortium within VTC
- Application screening through course enrollment
- Acceptance of consortial agreement by institutions
- Fees at host institution/fee structure
- Lack of institutionalization
|
Other solutions:
- Solve summer financial aid problem
- Institutionalize existing or more traditional short-term programs
- Empower campus study abroad officials
- Encourage institutions to reconceptualize with internationalization as a goal
- Reconsider one program, every-one-can-apply model
- Eight-week, six credit summer semester using same model as regional international semester
- Extended pre-departure
- Cross-cultural
- Post-experience follow-up
- Faculty are available
- Works with community colleges
- Longer than current summer programs
- Financial aid (NSEP, Gilman, institutional aid/loans) may be available/limited
- Abroad portion of model could vary from 2-4 weeks; flexible depending on availability of host institution/faculty/students
- Possibility of adding students to travel portion, under separate cohort and separate leadership in order to lower costs, increase revenue (fee)
- Short-term visa
|