Conference Handouts & Past Agendas

  Discussion Board | Program Development Manual | Faculty Development Opportunities | Resources & Conference Handouts | Travel Advisories & News 
Embassies & Consulates 

Restructured Model
Regional International Semester


     STRENGTHS
  • Continuity of experience and learning
  • Integration of learning between theory and practice (foreign language; environmental studies; political science)
  • More cost effective than a full semester travel component
  • Shorter abroad experience is less disruptive to student lives
  • Financial aid availability
  • Longer than spring-break model
  • Availability of modular courses already established
  • Academic solidity – antidote to ‘Cancun’ syndrome
  • Frees up stay- at-home faculty to do research, etc.
  • Collaboration with other faculty
  • Potential for visibility to other students
  • Potential for team teaching
  • Intensive orientation
  • Home institution tuition, etc. 
  • Focused, intensive study
     WEAKNESSES
  • Modular nature of model; does not fit well into traditional semester
  • Students must complete entire program; not as flexible
  • Institutions must make modules interchangeable
  • Faculty course load and coverage
  • Accountability; faculty who do prep work and don’t travel miss opportunity to learn from experience and follow-through with academic goals
  • Motivation to teach is diminished if faculty does not travel with group
  • Additional costs of 4-week abroad component vs. 2-week
  • Faculty availability
  • Model only works with full-time students
  • Employment schedules of students
  • Recruitment issues
  • Coping 
     OPPORTUNITIES
  • Four week model provides enhanced professional development more so than two week
  • Establishing linkages abroad (sister cities, other cities)
  • Opportunity to further strengthen international programs at each institution
  • Lead to more developed consortial infrastructure
  • Recruitment of potential students
  • Faculty availability is greater in summer; opportunities for faculty participation are greater in summer (student availability?)
  • Opportunities to develop scholarships/funding specifically to support consortial efforts
     THREATS
  • Administratively labor intensive; high cost
  • Under enrollment
  • Lack of model for VTRIP consortium within VTC
  • Application screening through course enrollment
  • Acceptance of consortial agreement by institutions
  • Fees at host institution/fee structure
  • Lack of institutionalization


Other solutions:

  • Solve summer financial aid problem
  • Institutionalize existing or more traditional short-term programs
  • Empower campus study abroad officials
  • Encourage institutions to reconceptualize with internationalization as a goal
  • Reconsider one program, every-one-can-apply model
  • Eight-week, six credit summer semester using same model as regional international semester
    • Extended pre-departure
    • Cross-cultural
    • Post-experience follow-up
    • Faculty are available
    • Works with community colleges
    • Longer than current summer programs
    • Financial aid (NSEP, Gilman, institutional aid/loans) may be available/limited
    • Abroad portion of model could vary from 2-4 weeks; flexible depending on availability of host institution/faculty/students
    • Possibility of adding students to travel portion, under separate cohort and separate leadership in order to lower costs, increase revenue (fee)
    • Short-term visa




 VTRIP Pressroom | FAQ's | Study Abroad | For Students | For Faculty | Special Events 
Contact Us | Site Map | Home Page
Copyright © 2002 The Tidewater Regional International Project. All Rights Reserved.
For problems with this site contact the Webmaster.